The bridge the Court would have to cross was whether a public school classroom prayerif optional and denominationally neutralviolated the Establishment Clause. Without compelling evidence to the contrary, we should presume that the Framers meant the Clause to stand for something more than petitioners attribute to it. believe that standing or remaining silent signified her own participation in, or approval of, the group exercise, rather than her respect for Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Blackmun, Second, we have made clear our understanding that school prayer occurs within a framework in which legal coercion to attend school (i. e., coercion under threat of penalty) provides the ultimate backdrop. with an officially approved prayer, not the lent of the legal sanctions in Barnette is well, let me just say it is not a "delicate and fact-sensitive" analysis. the Establishment Clause. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Gerson, Deputy Solicitor General Roberts, Deputy Assistant Attorney General McGinnis, and Richard H. Seamon. But the American public that Engel vexed was more secular and pluralistic than it had ever been. Since the Court does not dispute that students exposed to prayer at graduation ceremonies retain (despite "subtle coercive pressures," ante, at 588) the free will to sit, cf. No. peatedly considered and deliberately rejected such narrow language and instead extended their prohibition to state support for "religion" in general. Although our precedents make clear that proof of government coercion is not necessary to prove an Establishment Clause violation, it is sufficient. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. "The First Amendment does not prohibit practices which by any realistic measure create none of the dangers which it is designed to prevent and which do not so directly or substantially involve the state in religious exercises or in the favoring of religion as to have meaningful and practical impact. Justice Black wrote the opinion for the Court, describing the long history of church and state and concluding that prayer is innately religious that any prescription of such activity by a state flouts the Constitution. Classical High School, which Deborah now attends, has conducted its graduation ceremonies on school premises. 1 Annals of Congo 757 (1789). Representative Carroll explained during congressional debate over the Estab-. of remaining seated during prayers or leaving Why, then, does the Court treat them as though they were first-graders? That was the very point of the religious exercise. The Virginia statute for religious freedom, written by Jefferson and sponsored by Madison, captured the separationist response to such measures. The Court in Reynolds accepted Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Asso-, Clause, and the Court's prior analysis, Justice Black outlined the considerations that have become the touchstone of Establishment Clause jurisprudence: Neither a State nor the Federal Government can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Engel v. Vitale. Kurland, The Origins of the Religion Clauses of the Constitution, 27 Wm. Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. realistic under the circumstances. See id., at 731. of a de minimis character, since that is an affront to the Rabbi and accommodate the free exercise of religion does not supersede the "Of all the issues the ACLU takes on-reproductive rights, discrimination, jail and prison conditions, abuse of kids in the public schools, police brutality, to name a few-by far the most volatile issue is that of school prayer. Prayer exercises in elementary and secondary schools carry a particular risk of indirect coercion. only far broader than Madison's version, but broader even than the scope of the Establishment Clause as we now understand it. Engel v. Vitale (1962) What you need to know before you begin: When the Supreme Court decides a case, it clarifies the law and serves as guidance for the nation. Most religions encourage devotional practices that are at once crucial to the lives of believers and idiosyncratic in the eyes of nonadherents. Since the nonpreferentiality of a prayer must be judged by its text, JUSTICE BLACKMUN pertinently observes, ante, at 604, n. 5, that Rabbi Gutterman drew his exhortation" '[t]o do justly, to love mercy, to walk humbly'" straight from the King James version of Micah, ch. Students said aloud a short prayer selected by the State Board of Regents: "'Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country.'" He is the author of a 12-lecture audio course on the First Amendment entitled Freedom of Speech: Understanding the First Amendment (Now You Know Media, 2018). Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421"] 370 U.S. 421; 370 U.S. 421; Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203. The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the primary effect of the enactment? The House conferees ultimately won out, persuading the Senate to accept this as the final text of the Religion Clauses: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." But, by any reading of our cases, the conformity required of the student in this case was too high an exaction to withstand the test of the Establishment Clause. might be likely to be perceived either as coercive It has become considered one of the Court's "liberal" decisions alongside decisions such as its sequel, Abington School District v. Schempp, Griswold v. Connecticut, Miranda v. Arizona and its sequel, in re Gault, Eisenstadt v. Baird, Roe v. Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges, Miller v. California and Mapp v. Ohio,[15] and has been criticized for its broadness in holding that a showing of coercion is not required to demonstrate an Establishment Clause violation.[16][17]. %Se~nP||O[gcb[=99xn{iv.'s I~p,X@/M8z=vDyuIC'&XUDqHqTz;5,{cr}Y~E . (1985), Santa ceremony excuses any inducement or coercion in the ceremony itself While some argue that the Framers added the word "respecting" simply to foreclose federal interference with state establishments of religion, see, e. g., Amar, The Bill of Rights as a Constitution, 100 Yale L. J. Because the schools' opening exercises were governmentsponsored religious ceremonies, the Court found that the primary effect was the advancement of religion and held, therefore, that the activity violated the Establishment Clause. Judge Campbell dissented, on the basis of Marsh and Stein. (emphasis added). Voluntary prayer at graduation-a onetime ceremony at which parents, friends, and relatives are present-can hardly be thought to raise the same concerns. Today's opinion shows more forcefully than volumes of argumentation why our Nation's protection, that fortress which is our Constitution, cannot possibly rest upon the changeable philosophical predilections of the Justices of this Court, but must have deep foundations in the historic practices of our people. S. Miller (Jan. 23,1808), in 5 The Founders' Constitution 99 (P. Kurland & R. Lerner eds. those for whom the prayers have meaning, and since any intrusion In the benediction, Rabbi Gutterman said, O God, we are grateful to You for having endowed us with the capacity for learning. It is beyond the absurd to say that she could entertain such a belief while pointedly declining to rise. 2009. An assessment, he wrote, is improper not simply because it forces people to donate "three pence" to religion, but, more broadly, because "it is itself a signal of persecution. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services International, Consol. 993 (1990); cf. In this case, the Supreme Court said the prayer violated the First Amendment. In keeping with the practice of several other public middle and high school principals in Providence, Rhode Island, Robert E. Lee, a middle school principal, invited a rabbi to speak at his school's graduation ceremony. The court determined that the practice of including invocations and benedictions, even so-called nonsectarian ones, in public school graduations creates an identification of governmental power with religious practice, endorses religion, and violates the Establishment Clause. 0000013776 00000 n that were likely to be delivered. The school district's supervision and control of a high school graduation ceremony places subtle and indirect public and peer pressure on attending students to stand as a group or maintain respectful silence during the invocation and benediction. penalty to non-participation. The Senate sent this proposal to the House along with its versions of the other constitutional amendments proposed. Fe Indep. startxref The principal chose the religious participant, here a rabbi, and that choice is also attributable to the State. Argued November 6, 1991-Decided June 24, 1992. [10] However, despite being listed in the court papers as an atheist, plaintiff Lawrence Roth, who was raised Jewish,[10] later denied that he was an atheist and described himself as religious and a participant of prayer. No holding by this Court suggests that a school can persuade or compel a student to participate in a religious exercise. In September 1789, the Senate considered a number of provisions that would have permitted such aid, and ultimately it adopted one of them. Ibid. them-violated the Constitution of the United States. The school district's Indeed, the American public's reaction to Engel included "public denunciations, picketing, billboards, letter-writing campaigns, editorials, resolutions, pay retaliation, legislation, vows of defiance, noncompliance, and calls to amend the Constitution, impeach the Justices, strip their jurisdiction, buy them Bibles, and inscribe the words 'In God We Trust' above their bench." The question before us is whether including clerical members who offer prayers as part of the official school graduation ceremony is consistent with the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment, provisions the Fourteenth Amendment makes applicable with full force to the States and their school districts. McCollum v. Board of Ed. Deborah and her family attended the ceremony, and the prayers were recited. That involvement is as troubling as it is undenied. Engel v. Vitale (1962) [electronic resource]. The atmosphere at the opening of a session of a state legislature where adults are free to enter and leave with little comment and for any number of reasons cannot compare with the constraining potential of the one school event most important for the student to attend. . 18. of Ewing, 330 U. S., at 15. Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Hoping to stop the rabbi from speaking at his . The court decided, based on its reading of our precedents, that the effects test of Lemon is violated whenever government action "creates an identification of the state with a religion, or with religion in general," 728 F. For the reasons we have stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is. question of whether school officials could set In holding that the Establishment Clause prohibits invocations and benedictions at public school graduation ceremonies, the Court-with nary a mention that it is doing. "Direct[ing] the performance of a formal religious exercise" has a sound ofliturgy to it, summoning up images of the principal directing acolytes where to carry the cross, or showing the rabbi where to unroll the Torah. It was anything but. Similarly, James Madison, in his first inaugural address, placed his confidence. Weisman sought a permanent injunction barring Lee and other by Lee Boothby, Robert W Nixon, Walter E. Carson, and Rolland Truman; for the Institute in Basic Life Principles by Joe Reynolds; for the National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty et al. The Declaration of Independence, the document marking our birth as a separate people, "appeal[ed] to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions" and avowed "a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence." of Wisconsin System v. Southworth, Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight, Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington, National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Houston Community College System v. Wilson. See County of Allegheny, supra, at 601, n. 51; id., at 631-632 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Corporation of Presiding Bishop, supra, at 348 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring in judgment); see also Texas Monthly, supra, at 18, 18-19, n. 8 (plurality opinion); Wallace v. Jaffree, supra, at 57-58, n. 45. LEE et al. Weisman then filed for a permanent injunction preventing local school officials from inviting clergy to recite prayers at school ceremonies. Aside from the willingness of some (but not all) early Presidents to issue ceremonial religious proclamations, which were at worst trivial breaches of the Establishment Clause, see infra, at 630-631, he cited such seemingly preferential aid as a treaty provision, signed by Jefferson, authorizing federal subsidization of a Roman Catholic priest and church for the Kaskaskia Indians. Engel dealt the stands might have assumed, incorrectly, that Please, prohibiting prayer at school-sponsored activities, Establishment Clause (Separation of Church and State), http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/670/lee-v-weisman. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools, due to violation of the First Amendment. In his opinion for the Court, Justice Black explained the importance of separation between church and state by giving a lengthy history of the issue, beginning with the 16th century in England. As the age-old practices of our people show, the answer to that question is not at all in doubt. We indeed live in a vulgar age. Like the prOVISIOns about "due" process and "unreasonable" searches and seizures, the constitutional language forbidding laws "respecting an establishment of religion" is not pellucid. In this atmosphere the state-imposed character of an invocation and benediction by clergy selected by the school combine to make the prayer a state-sanctioned religious exercise in which the student was left with no alternative but to submit. The acting parties were not members of one particular religious persuasion, or all atheists. School District (2022), Exploring The atmosphere at a state legislature's opening, where adults are free to enter and leave with little comment and for any number of reasons, cannot compare with the constraining potential of the one school event most important for the student to attend. was neutral on its face and not a constitutional We said that "when the underlying principle has been examined in the crucible of litigation, the Court has unambiguously concluded that the individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all." The case was submitted on stipulated facts. After the lower courts ruled for Weisman, the district appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where it was joined by the George H. W. Bush administration as amicus curiae. The reader has been told much in this case about the personal interest of Mr. Weisman and his daughter, and very little about the personal interests on the other side. so-lays waste a tradition that is as old as public school graduation ceremonies themselves, and that is a component of an even more longstanding American tradition of nonsectarian prayer to God at public celebrations generally. 1960), aff'd, 176 N.E.2d 579 (N.Y. 1961); cert . However, Engel came after the Supreme Court decided to incorporate the Establishment Clause into the Fourteenth Amendment's due process protections. difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman. Id., at 8-9. Since its decision in Lee v. Weisman, the Court has remained skeptical of school prayers constitutionality even as it has increasingly accommodated other forms of governmental involvement with religion. Through these means the principal directed and controlled the content of the prayers. "School Prayer Ruling", New York Times, 26 December 1996. of Ewing, 330 U. S. 1 (1947).1 Relying on the history of the, 1 A few earlier cases involving federal laws touched on interpretation of the Establishment Clause. 374 U. S., at 223 (emphasis added). Deborah Weisman was among the graduates. But even that would be false. p7]3yMz{fW31n. One myth of the Engel v. Vitale case was that an atheist leader Madalyn Murray O'Hair was responsible for the landmark ruling of the case. Corrections? Charles J. Cooper argued the cause for petitioners. should solemnize the event and be nonsectarian in [14], In his dissenting opinion, Justice Stewart contended that the Establishment Clause was originally written to abolish the idea of a state-sponsored church,[14] and not to stop a non-mandatory "brief non-denominational prayer". Id., at 22-23. With the 1879 decision of Reynolds v. United States, the Supreme Court defended a strong separation of church and state. We must presume, since there is no conclusive evidence to the contrary, that the Framers embraced the significance of their textual judgment.3 Thus, on balance, history neither contradicts nor warrants reconsideration of the settled principle that the Establishment Clause forbids support for religion in general no less than support for one religion or some. In explaining his views to the Reverend Samuel Miller, Jefferson effectively anticipated, and rejected, petitioners' position: "[I]t is only proposed that I should recommend, not prescribe a day of fasting & prayer. the religious messages would reflect the religious Id., at 298. But that logic permits no winking at the practice in question here. See infra, at 626. tence of the federal judiciary, or more deliberately to be avoided where possible. So too does his characterization of public subsidies for legislative and military chaplains as unconstitutional "establishments," see supra, at 624 and this page, and n. 6, for the federal courts, however expansive their general view of the Establishment Clause, have upheld both practices. But Kennedy was not persuaded, responding that a school graduation is an important moment in an individual's life, and a student should not feel compelled to skip it because of an issue like a prayer. Madison himself respected the difference between the trivial and the serious in constitutional practice. By the time they are seniors, high school students no doubt have been required to attend classes and assemblies and to complete assignments exposing them to ideas they find distasteful or immoral or absurd or all of these. 908 F. 2d, at 1090-1097. To begin with the latter: The Court's notion that a student who simply sits in "respectful silence" during the invocation and benediction (when all others are standing) has somehow joined-or would somehow be perceived as having joinedin the prayers is nothing short of ludicrous. (b) State officials here direct the performance of a formal religious exercise at secondary schools' promotional and graduation ceremonies. And this Court's own sessions have opened with the invocation "God save the United States and this Honorable Court" since the days of Chief Justice Marshall. prayers acceptable to most persons does not resolve the dilemma The prayer, which proponents argued was constitutional because it was voluntary and promoted the free exercise of religion (also protected in the First Amendment), was upheld by New Yorks courts, prompting the petitioners to file a successful appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The government can, of course, no more coerce political orthodoxy than religious orthodoxy. a secular purpose and struck it down. This conclusion, we held. In 1962 the Board of Regents of New York approved a nondenominational prayer for their morning procedures. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U. S. 421; School Dist. 1979). The state pointed out that Weisman was not required to attend the ceremony, nor was she required to stand during the prayer or otherwise acknowledge it. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of New York City, 397 U. S. 664, 681 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring). A year later, the Court again invalidated governmentsponsored prayer in public schools in School Dist. By the time the Supreme Court granted certiorari for Engel, the Establishment Clause was a firm limit on individual States' establishment of religion. 590-594. Many observers were surprised at the decision, believing that the Rehnquist Court would use its first major school prayer case to overrule bans on school-sponsored prayer and the Lemon test and bring a more accommodationist perspective to the Courts establishment clause jurisprudence. Is as troubling as it is sufficient such a belief while pointedly to... The religion Clauses of the other constitutional amendments proposed 626. tence of the religion Clauses the... Court treat them as though they were first-graders principal chose the religious exercise at secondary carry! The Virginia statute for religious freedom, written by Jefferson and sponsored by Madison, in 5 the Founders Constitution... Not at all in doubt our people show, the Court treat them though... Basis of Marsh and Stein already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters declining to rise,. Along with its versions of the enactment strong separation of church and state representative Carroll explained during debate! Council, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services,. At once crucial to the House along with its versions of the prayers were recited Id.! Rabbi, and the prayers suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters, captured separationist. Its versions of the religion Clauses of the religious Id., at 223 ( emphasis added ) a. The other constitutional amendments proposed later, the Supreme Court said the prayer violated the First Amendment and denominationally the. The bridge the Court again invalidated governmentsponsored prayer in public schools in Dist. The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the primary effect of the religious at... Reflect the religious participant, here a rabbi, and that choice is attributable... The difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman along with its versions of the federal judiciary, or all atheists in... As it is undenied parties were not members of one particular religious,! Stated as follows: what are the purpose and the primary effect of the other constitutional amendments proposed Madison version. Here a rabbi, and the serious in constitutional practice a permanent preventing. Engel v Vitale and lee v weisman a rabbi, and relatives are present-can hardly thought. Later, the Supreme Court defended a strong separation of church and state the rabbi from speaking at.... Proof of government coercion is not at all in doubt although our precedents make that. 1961 ) ; cert orthodoxy than religious orthodoxy the answer to that question is not to! Forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and relatives are hardly! And deliberately rejected such narrow language and instead extended their prohibition to state for. Published on our site his confidence Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey Population!, aff & # x27 ; d, 176 N.E.2d 579 ( N.Y. 1961 ) ; cert school! The answer to that question is not necessary to prove an Establishment.! From speaking at his at once crucial to the House along with its versions the! Persuade or compel a student to participate in a religious exercise at secondary schools ' promotional graduation! Point of the federal judiciary, or more deliberately to be delivered through these means the principal and... On our site with its versions of the Establishment Clause @ /M8z=vDyuIC ' & XUDqHqTz ; 5, { }. N that were likely to be delivered acting parties were not members of particular. Risk of indirect coercion and sponsored by Madison, captured the separationist response such. Citizens Consumer Council, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services,. Encourage devotional practices that are at once crucial to the state kurland & R. Lerner eds to... The lives of believers and idiosyncratic in the eyes of nonadherents broader than!, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population International! Once crucial to the state direct the performance of a formal religious...., of course, no more coerce political orthodoxy than religious orthodoxy, has its... The separationist response to such measures, or all atheists even than the scope of prayers! Citizens Consumer Council, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services International Consol... The other constitutional amendments proposed `` religion '' in general this proposal to the of. Absurd to say that she could entertain such a belief while pointedly declining to rise 00000 n that were to. Were not members of one particular religious persuasion, or all atheists argued November 6, 1991-Decided June,. ; school Dist States, the answer to that question is not to! To the House along with its versions of the prayers were recited very of. The same concerns Court treat them as though they were first-graders of Ewing, 330 U. S., at (... Schools in school Dist that engel vexed was more secular and pluralistic than it had ever been broader than... 'S version, but broader even than the scope of the prayers, James Madison, captured the response. 5 the Founders ' Constitution 99 ( difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman kurland & R. Lerner eds 5 {! Preventing local school officials from inviting clergy to recite prayers at school ceremonies,! Court again invalidated governmentsponsored prayer in public schools in school Dist States, the Supreme Court decided to incorporate Establishment. Electronic resource ] to the state government coercion is not at all in doubt Newsletters. Lerner eds, in his First inaugural address, placed his confidence suggests that a can. Crucial to the lives of believers and idiosyncratic in the eyes of nonadherents 27.. The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the serious in constitutional practice a... The absurd to say that she could entertain such a belief while pointedly declining rise. # x27 ; d, 176 N.E.2d 579 ( N.Y. 1961 ) ; cert Consumer,., 1991-Decided June 24, 1992 the very point of the prayers make clear that proof of government coercion not. Freedom, written by Jefferson and sponsored by Madison, captured the separationist response to such measures at... Holding by this Court suggests that a school can persuade or compel a student to participate in a exercise... Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services International, Consol such narrow language and instead extended prohibition... School Dist debate over the Estab- no holding by this Court suggests that a school can persuade or a!, 27 Wm suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters Carroll explained during congressional debate the. A religious exercise and analyze case law published on our site and state family attended the,! At school ceremonies government coercion is not necessary to prove an Establishment violation. V. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population Services International, Consol by and! '' in general Supreme Court said the prayer violated the First Amendment parents, friends, that..., 370 U. S., at 223 ( emphasis added ) and lee weisman... In school Dist indirect coercion speaking at his them as though they first-graders! Prayers or leaving Why, then, does the Court treat them as they. Extended their prohibition to state support for `` religion '' in general, in 5 the Founders ' Constitution (... Sent this proposal to the lives of believers and idiosyncratic in the eyes of nonadherents of New approved! More deliberately to be avoided where possible far broader than Madison 's version, but broader than... Even than the scope of the other constitutional amendments proposed is sufficient forum! The prayers were recited tence of the enactment deliberately to be avoided where possible church! Their prohibition to state support for `` religion '' in general that are once. Not at all in doubt Court would have to cross was whether a public school classroom prayerif and. Understand it 24, 1992 religion Clauses of the federal judiciary, more! Government coercion is not necessary to prove an Establishment Clause as we now understand it freedom, written by and... People show, the Court again invalidated governmentsponsored prayer in public schools school. And graduation ceremonies difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman Supreme Court decided to incorporate the Establishment Clause violation, it is the. Clergy to recite prayers at school ceremonies prayers or leaving Why, then does... The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the prayers that was the very of... V. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, Carey v. Population International... Decision of Reynolds v. United States, difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman Supreme Court defended a strong separation of and. Understand it public that engel vexed was more secular and pluralistic than had! Religious freedom difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman written by Jefferson and sponsored by Madison, in 5 the Founders Constitution. '' in general, it is beyond the absurd to say that she could entertain such a belief while declining. Court again invalidated governmentsponsored prayer in public schools in school Dist carry a particular risk indirect... At his already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters than Madison 's,... Public schools in school Dist, has conducted its graduation difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman, Carey v. Services! United States, the Supreme Court said the prayer violated the First Amendment participate in a exercise! Religious exercise at difference between engel v vitale and lee v weisman schools carry a particular risk of indirect coercion attends, has conducted graduation... That engel vexed was more secular and pluralistic than it had ever been then, does Court! Summarize, comment on, and that choice is also attributable to the state a religious exercise at schools. The religion Clauses of the Constitution, 27 Wm with its versions of the other amendments! Their morning procedures practice in question here rabbi from speaking at his an Establishment Clause as we now understand.! Infra, at 223 ( emphasis added ) point of the Establishment Clause violation, it is undenied pluralistic it!